Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kuban kazak/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * (added by Fut.Perf.)
 * (added by Fut.Perf.)
 * (added by Fut.Perf.)

Evidence submitted by Hillock65
It is my strong suspicion that this account is being used by User:Kuban kazak, currently banned by the arbcom. There are several clues that point to this conclusion:
 * Even before leaving for the ban he was determined to edit WP one way or the other.
 * User:HenrichB just like Kuban kazak wages revert wars on multiple articles specifically relating to Russian and Ukrainian history.
 * User:HenrichB's command of the English language varies greatly, from just being barely able to write simple sentences to verbose and detailed arguments, which suggests, that this account may be shared by several users.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Note: I can't say anything about a possible connection between Kuban kazak and HenrichB, except that I find it a bit unlikely in light of their different command of English. I blocked HenrichB yesterday for revert-warring as a meatpuppet of User:Voyevoda, solicited on ru-wiki. His sudden good English in the two talkpage posts to User talk:Will Beback may not necessarily be a case of shared account use, but more likely proxying for blocked Voyevoda, which is also illicit. Except for these two recent posts, his English has been uniformly abysmal. Finally, the connection between HenrichB and the 79.139.* IP is proven ; another IP from the same range,, appeared today, which means HenrichB is also block-evading now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

CheckUser requests
Requested by Hillock65 (talk) 05:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

MuZemike 05:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Kuban kazak is stale. HenrichB ✅ as the IPs. Brandon (talk) 07:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
From looking at the edit patterns of the two, I'm going to say that they are not related. However, I have made a rangeblock on 79.139.202.144/28 (as opposed to the singular block on 79.139.202.149) for block evasion. MuZemike 17:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)