Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kumar Vaidyanathan/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Account appears to have been created just to defend speedy deletion of Shankar Srinivasan KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . GABgab 00:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Instantly returns to tagged article like previous accounts, it's too suspicious to be a coincidence including by returning to the user's talk page and "asking for clarification and contested deletion". SwisterTwister  talk  00:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please compare to the master and the previous sock. Thanks, GABgab 00:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Alleged sock and master are . Alleged sock and are ✅.  Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that the alleged sock replaced a blocked IP's comments contesting deletion - and all those IPs geolocate to Karnataka, and are clearly making the same argument. Like them, Adhik Patel says that the page shouldn't be deleted because the page is sourced. Both . GABgab 23:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)