Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kurdo777/Archive

Evidence submitted by William S. Saturn
User:Kurdo777 has a history of sockpuppetry. He was blocked indefinitely on June 10, 2009, but was unblocked the next day with a promise that he would not use any other accounts.

Then on June 15 User:WIMYV was created. He started editing the same Iranian-related pages. Today, Kurdo777 made a controversial revert on Iran and state terrorism. He then defended his edits on the talk page and nine minutes later WIMYV came along stating nothing else except that he concurred with Kurdo777 and then made the same revert.

I don't think this is simply a coincidence. There was no discussion on the page for 8 days, then out of the blue Kurdo777 did his revert and an account created less than a week after his unblock in June, repeated the same revert. William S. Saturn (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Possible, but I'm not entirely sure. A checkuser would be nice to help clear this up. NW ( Talk ) 01:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

✅ =

is to be the same person, but may be a meatpuppet. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Well taking into account this the first finding should not be a surprise. He stated it himself two days prior to this CU Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

– I am currently not compelled to block based on meatpuppetry in this case. The two confirmed accounts are declared, though it is strongly recommended that Behzad.Modares declare his alternate account to avoid confusion. –MuZemike 01:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)