Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kusamanic/Archive

Evidence submitted by Opinoso
User Kusamanic is always removing sourced informations that claim Whites are minority in Chile, and is always posting other sources claiming they are majority. Kusamanic and this IP have very similar contributions, dedicated to talk about Chilean race and its European component. Both remove informations from other users that talk about Amerindians in Chile: ; ;

Quite obvious that both are the same person. Other users already said this is his IP sock poppet. Opinoso (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I hope this IP number will be investigated, so that we can know from where it comes from. Opinoso (talk) 21:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Hi, With this user have been starting had many problems that does not respect the sources (see below) and his obsession with Chile. For this and other similar reasons has been often block also being warned by his constant personal attacks on other users, as we see here aside has been responsible for a "public trial" against me, as we see here. It is why I call it sabotage to my image. Also, I am accused by User:Opinoso the use of puppet accounts, apparently without knowledge of the policies of Wikipedia, which refers to "Sockpuppet", who are the users who have multiple accounts registered to engage in vandalism or to avoid Blocks. This is obviously not my case, I have never been blocked in more than 1 year working for the Wikipedia.


 * Disagree: In addition, all started after a consensus achieved by the User: Likeminas and I, which after a few days the User:Opinoso again changed the information that was reversed by the User:190.46.53.155 to a previous edition of consensus. Then the User:Opinoso again changed the main information of the article Chilean people, and adding information without giving the exact page that you can confirm the information.


 * Brief argument about their lack of neutrality: User:Opinoso doesn't act in good faith in each case. It imposes his personal opinion for on the mentioned sources and he has an appreciation preconceived on the population from Chile according to his point of view like we can observe here. ←Of course my personal opinion is not a source, but I have been to Chile myself and there's no way that 60% are Whites. Even in the areas of "German settlement" of Southern Chile, the local population looks more Amerindian than anything else→ Without respecting the sources where they write of a white majority in Chile that varies from 52,7% and 90% to the population´s.  finally remarking that Chile is amerindian-mestizo like he writes here in one of its summaries of editions saying this without any source to back it up.Chile is mostly Amerindian-mestizo.--Kusamanic (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Kusamanic, I cannot post about Opinoso anymore otherwise I will be banned. It is enough to say that you have witnessed his tactics. Good luck! Saludos! Grenzer22 (talk)

Conclusions
No action taken at this time. I think the autoblock got the IP here as the IP hasn't edited in several days now. MuZemike 21:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)