Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kyladcarter/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

SPA removing tags at Kyla Carter Praxidicae (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I've since added more after opening this, as they keep coming out of the woodwork. They're all SPAs, likely meat puppetry adding garbage sourcing to try and get this kept at AFD. Praxidicae (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * There appear to be a ton more spas/socks at the afd now. Praxidicae (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I was tipped off that this might be a sock-puppet ring because of | this diff. I thought nothing of it until I noticed that Onward05 had responded to my editing for clarification with umbrage that I would dare to edit his erroneous second vote. Then Onward05 responded to my response to Jane776 (who I think is another sock) by claiming that my concerns are unfounded. On looking closer, I noticed that Arragogg's only edit was that diff. I was actually about to change my decision vis-a-vis the deletion discussion mentioned by Praxidicae since the sourcing on the article in question has expanded until Onward05 responded instead of Jane776. Rockphed (talk) 16:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * . I don't think it's necessary to create another case for Cjsuki, but I'll leave that to the clerk's discretion.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * With only two accounts and both of them tagged, I'm inclined to agree that a second case page is not immediately necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * . I don't think it's necessary to create another case for Cjsuki, but I'll leave that to the clerk's discretion.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * With only two accounts and both of them tagged, I'm inclined to agree that a second case page is not immediately necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * . I don't think it's necessary to create another case for Cjsuki, but I'll leave that to the clerk's discretion.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * With only two accounts and both of them tagged, I'm inclined to agree that a second case page is not immediately necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * . I don't think it's necessary to create another case for Cjsuki, but I'll leave that to the clerk's discretion.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * With only two accounts and both of them tagged, I'm inclined to agree that a second case page is not immediately necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * . I don't think it's necessary to create another case for Cjsuki, but I'll leave that to the clerk's discretion.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * With only two accounts and both of them tagged, I'm inclined to agree that a second case page is not immediately necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
The log data is stale by two years, but this is a quacking match with Kyladcarter, and has popped up in order to promote the child actress Kyla Carter. Request that an administrator (admin clerk or CU) look at the recent history of now-deleted Kyla Carter for more socks. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * See comment in case below, closing both. Girth Summit  (blether)  11:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
This account is already blocked, but as a spam account. Since it is another account promoting Kyla Carter, it has the same feathers as any other recent sock accounts. I am submitting it for completeness, and so that the feathers can be compared against any more waterbirds. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These two accounts ( and ) are ✅ to one another; it seems pretty obvious they're connected to the master. Blocking, tagged as proven. I've checked the history of the deleted draft, I see no unblocked suspicious accounts (just blocked socks, good faith gnomes and patrollers). Girth Summit  (blether)  11:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)