Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/La vérité gagne/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User has been involved in an ongoing dispute at Tulsi_Pujan_Diwas and has been pushing some pretty heavy POV stuff about this festival. Out of nowhere, the two socks listed showed up to support. One of which just registered, the other has never even touched the article. Praxidicae (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
AasraMahi and Amicable always are ✅ to each other. . MyOptimism is as they are editing from a company. Please move to AasraMahi.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Moved, closing. qedk (t 桜 c) 10:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Essentially, two single purpose accounts whitewashing Asaram, a controversial godman. &#x222F; WBG converse 05:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Salona Choudhury doesn't look like an SPA to me. Based on their edit to L&T Technology Services an equally compelling case could be made that they're a sock of Pamba23. Cabayi (talk) 10:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm. That's a fair point but overall, SC has weird contributions for a newbie. Hard to conclusively parse anything in this era of sub-leasing UPE-deals and all that. &#x222F; WBG converse 13:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Based on the edit history of Tulsi Pujan Diwas and its various pages I dug into this. The following accounts are ✅:
 * from Sockpuppet investigations/AasraMahi
 * Other accounts were seen in the check but they have not edited. Checkuser should be run on future reports.
 * is . Meatpuppetry cannot be ruled out;.
 * I also checked, who is strongly ❌ to everyone else here.
 * please review possible meatpuppetry by Salona Choudhury, and when you've finished, please merge Sockpuppet investigations/AasraMahi into this case. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge completed. Even if Salona Choudhury is a meatpuppet, it's indistinguishable from sockpuppetry, therefore I have blocked indef and tagged. Closing case. Sro23 (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge completed. Even if Salona Choudhury is a meatpuppet, it's indistinguishable from sockpuppetry, therefore I have blocked indef and tagged. Closing case. Sro23 (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This account was created a long time back but became active only when an earlier sock was blocked and the master was to be blocked (a few days earlier). Restoring the promotional content on Tulsi Pujan Diwas that the previous socks were doing --, referring to prior socks statements on talk page as own --. Also, this is a coattrack on a godman-convicted rapist -- Asaram and the socks have essentially been spamming multiple locations with propaganda material. The beginnings of this account are similar to Salona Choudhury, the last sock to be blocked which was used to revert content on this article to that of the sockmaster just before being blocked, an action that was immediately replicated by this account. This is a bit weird, but other than Asaram related content, all these accounts have a pattern of one Indian topic and one western topic that they repeatedly contribute to, but there's no overlap with that between the accounts. This is too stale for a CU to match with earlier accounts, so only requesting a behavioral evaluation. After my coming to this walled garden through some admin activity, I've become involved in the content here. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm persuaded by the evidence presented. Both accounts were created about three years ago, but one didn't edit until the other one had been blocked, the similarities between the edits and those of other socks are too close to overlook, and the fact that both accounts had near-identical user pages (prior to being tagged) seems like another give-away. Closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)