Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ladysybilla/Archive

Report date April 18 2009, 17:49 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

I cannot access previously deleted versions of the Russet Noon article. Could I ask an admin to please compare User:Frogwidget's additions to this article with content that had been here and in the speedied Ladysybilla article posted by the now banned user Ladysybilla? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Shawn in Montreal (talk)

User:Frogwidget (talk) I've been watching it from here as it unfolded and thought that should the page stay, it would be good to mention the online arguments surrounding the book, namely the copyright issues since that is something that has come up before (the Lexicon) and will probably come up again. I live near Blacksburg, Virginia, about thirty minutes away from Virginia Tech. Please send me another talk if I need to add anything further, because this is my first Wikipedia day.
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * If I've accused you unjustly, I apologize in advance. I just could not recall if your edits were identical to the banned user, or not, and thought that this process would shed some light. Incidentally, if you haven't already done so, you should make your Keep arguments at the article's deletion discussion. I don't agree with you but you have every right to voice your views. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It's all right - I can completely understand the need to check. I also apologize for the repeated editings, as I'm used to working through my own HTML documents or blogs (livejournal) where editing repeatedly does not affect the viewing of others.  I will go to the discussion, thank you for the tip.  User:Frogwidget (talk)   —Preceding undated comment added 18:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC).


 * My gut tells me User:Frogwidget is a good faith edcitor and not a sock of Ladysybilla. How do I withdraw an SPI? --Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * I could have archived it, but I'm looking for another reviewer.  Syn  ergy 22:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 *  Syn  ergy 22:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)