Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leo1pard/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The two accounts have similar interests in promoting subpopulations of lions as distinct, and comparisons of various big cats. See deleted contribs and User:Punetor i Rregullt5/sandbox/Jaguar versus leopard, User:Punetor i Rregullt5/sandbox/Comparison of cheetahs, jaguars and leopards.Also see (alternative) - the timeline suggests quick changing and blocs of edits by one or other editor. Both speak in a fairly similar way (hard to get a sense of this with representative diffs) and have a large overlap in co-edited pages. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Casliber has started a sockpuppet investigation about me being, despite the fact that Punetor and I had disagreements, like here, and I already told Casliber two days ago about this, and that I only met Punetor this year, as far as I could remember. Like Punetor said to me, after I alerted Punetor about Casliber raising the suspicion of sock-puppetry, he has 5 months of experience in the Albanian Wikipedia, whereas I don't know Albanian, and I did have a slight disagreement with Punetor about who was or who wasn't involved in this, and using even that, I can say that I'm not Punetor, in the same way that I believe Casliber is not the same person as another user with overlapping interests or with whom he has cooperated. I prefer not to say who that person is, that's just a demonstration, that just as I am not Punetor even if we have similarities, I believe that Casliber is not the same person as another user even if they have similarities. Leo1pard (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2018 (UTC); edited 13:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Well, as I said to Leo1pard talk page, I have about 5 months editing in Albanian Wikipedia, and Leo1pard does't know a single word in Albanian like Po (yes), and Jo (no). And If I'm allowed to tag a user that is an administrator in Albanian Wikipedia and talk about this issue, I would tag 1l2l3k. Thank you! — Punetor i Rregullt5ALBAN (talk) 13:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

And by the way, I'm not Albanian, I'm Asian. Leo1pard (talk) 13:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you running a checkuser? ——  SerialNumber  54129  14:12, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That would be quite a trick if she were. She's no doubt looking into the behavioral issues.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Correct. I am not a check user. I will be only looking into the behavioral issues. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You recommend against a CU? ——  SerialNumber  54129  17:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * @ ; failed ping above^^^  ——  SerialNumber  54129  17:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes. To be precise, I do not see any good reason for a CheckUser to use CheckUser tools to see the IPs of these two users. Significant evidence that they are the same person would be required for that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Please give me a bit of time to look into this. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:41, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

I looked for around 40 minutes. I may have missed something, but I see no solid evidence that these are the same people. I see lots of indications that these not the same people. I would recommend against a CU. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:59, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree that the evidence is insufficient, not just for a check, but for any action. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, indeed, for any action, barring someone finding something significant. And certainly not a CU. Cheers. Thank you, Bbb23. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)