Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leopard017/Archive

07 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The first clue is at the talk page of Nina Dobrev, where the user has been pushing its Bulgarian POV. 37.143.231.48 posts this at the talk page. A few moments later, Dvrt09 shows up and adds its signature for that post. So we can safely assume that the IP is indeed Dvrt09. Looking at the history of the IP, we have this edit to the talk page of another user a while earlier. And in a similar manner, a few moments later Leopard017 shows up, and adds this comment, effectively linking the IP to yet another account.

The IPs and accounts also use "!???!" extensively.

It would seem that the user pushes his Bulgarian POV to the point of it being tendentious, and then moves on to another account. See the history of Talk:Bulgars, as well as WP:BLPN where the user brings up "racial purity" and DNA.

There are also clues that would point to that the user is several other users at Talk:Bulgars. I did not add the other accounts to the list above, but the behavioral evidence is pretty strong.

For example,


 * The exclamation points in this and many other edits
 * 145.255.195.39 refers to a user as "this guy jingby", 37.143.231.48 (who we already know is the user above) refers to the user as "this guy jingby", User:Kanas Juvigi Asparukh refers to the user as "this guy jingby".

The user admits to using proxies and Internet cafés here, so I don't know what a checkuser would bring up. Nymf talk to me 19:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I have nothing to do with these users:145.255.195.39 and Kanas Juvigi Asparukh.I am using a router and a shared IP:37.143.231.48 with my roommate Leopard017 which is not forbidden in wikipedia.WP:ROOMMATE and WP:SHARE say that "If they do not wish to disclose the connection, they should avoid editing in the same areas, particularly on controversial topics."We never broke that rule so I don't see a problem.The only one pushing POV is Nymf because I already proved my point on the BLP noticeboard with arguments and sources.Actually another editor brought up these words ""racial purity" not me and I don't see what this have to do with the topic here.I think that using false accusations instead of arguments and sources is below the level of wiki editors. --Dvrt09 (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The two users have never even edited the same page, and their only connection is their IP address. As such, I am closing this request with no action taken. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)