Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liefernando1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Liefernando1 (the master) was blocked on a number of projects for inserting machine translations into the project and continuing to insert them, even after multiple deletions etc. The second suspected sock posts a question on my talk page asking for tips on how to imporve their articles (see here. Additionally, the account has a really ducky username, just like the third one. The first account is suspected due to this edit. As this appears to be a rather clear WP:DUCK-case I will not request a checkuser investigation (I'm also unsure of the added value of a sleeper check, since they appear to be editing from mobile - and are known to use proxies from time to time). Daniuu (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These accounts are already blocked/locked. Added tags, requested lock for the unlocked one, closing. Spicy (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The first edit of this user is quite suspicious, as it consists of removing a claim of an earlier sock. Additionally, the continuation of the past sock's activity on the French wiki does not really help that impression. Daniuu (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . . Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same behavior as the previous accounts. The account asks nlwiki sysops to create articles that got deleted before and spam the talk page of their master. During the past requests, I did not request CU because those accounts were obvious ducks and I was unsure a CU investigation could provide additional value. However, this time, I'd like to ask a checkuser to investigate for any sleepers (and compare this account to the master). Daniuu (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * In addition to this request: REDSUN17 also thanked me for a previous deletion on the Dutch Wikipedia (see here), which makes the account even more ducky. --Daniuu (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Second account added based on the similarity in username and the idwiki edit. --Daniuu (talk) 14:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I went back and checked all the accounts in the archive; I'm retagging them as ✅ based on a combination of what I found plus some previous notes from nlwiki in cuwiki, and the two new ones here are also ✅. Requesting glocks for everybody.  Running a sleeper check was not practical. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Just outed himself at User talk:REDSUN12. Wasn't (auto)blocked, but appealed nevertheless. Kleuske (talk) 14:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Added tag and closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)