Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LieutenantJames20/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Besides the obvious similarity in names, the users' edits have almost exclusively to their user pages, with identical content repeated on each. The master has also edited the second sock's user page, further suggesting a connection. Drm310 (talk) 23:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nothing WP:ILLEGIT here. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus:
 * (found through deleted history)
 * Even without the additional two users, how is this not in violation of WP:SCRUTINY and WP:SOCK§Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts ? LieutenantJames20 only has 29 warnings on their talkpage... -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 14:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I did think it rather extraordinary that it was closed as Nothing WP:ILLEGIT here! Theroadislong (talk) 14:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * At the moment this was closed (December 3rd), the "socks" had only ever edited their own userpage. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * At the moment this was closed (December 3rd), the "socks" had only ever edited their own userpage. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See same nonsensical userpage here as latest blocked sock, here. See also.

(see also EF for 1997)

Requesting CU for sleepers. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I realize this is really old but adding for records, very similar user page and linking to same non-articles: User:CCECollections. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I just noticed a lot of crossover here with nonsense content from their userpages and seemingly made up (??) names and movies that only share a x-over with their userpages. I know a CU was already run but I'm not even sure where to begin cleanup for that one... CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * blocked CSFP as a confirmed sock. I haven’t tagged any of the accounts I blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Not me...maybe you saw some other account I blocked? ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You could do it now to make my mistake true. It was and not a CU block.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I think I found CSFP by randomly clicking on diffs while skimming through the recent changes log. It's surprising what you can find if you trust in the Force to guide you to the sockmasters.  But, yeah, this looks like LieutenantJames20. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Tagged with dual tags and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You could do it now to make my mistake true. It was and not a CU block.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I think I found CSFP by randomly clicking on diffs while skimming through the recent changes log. It's surprising what you can find if you trust in the Force to guide you to the sockmasters.  But, yeah, this looks like LieutenantJames20. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Tagged with dual tags and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)