Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lightbringer (usurped - blocked)/Archive

25 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Contributions fit nicely into the modus operandi listed in Long-term abuse/Lightbringer (usurped - blocked). SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked, tagged up. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  20:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

12 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Returning after Indefinite community ban. Same stuff, same articles. I've blacklisted the link being used. --Hu12 (talk) 00:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC) Hu12 (talk) 00:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Tagged and blocked Albertpirck & Ndg.2010.--Hu12 (talk) 02:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - To look for sleepers Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  23:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅, although is  (yet goes quack-quack).  No sleepers.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 02:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 03:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

12 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems to have returned--Hu12 (talk) 05:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC) Hu12 (talk) 05:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * You have provided no evidence to support your assertion. Please open another investigation that is duly substantiated. Thank you, AGK  [•] 20:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

this and MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist vs. Long-term abuse/Lightbringer (usurped - blocked). Accounts are likely stale, but seen the past maybe good to establish a fresh track. Dirk Beetstra T C 04:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Typical behaviour continued. Blocked already. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Tagging as a suspect and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I would prefer that a CU looks at this and establishes a recent track of records regarding IP(s) before closing.  This case was rather DUCKy, but future cases may not be..  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 12:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what you mean. What would a Checkuser data be used for? If there is other account, we can call checksuer to compare their IPs, but there is no other account.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * until there is a next account .. there is an LTA case on this master. May be useful to have an off-wiki record of the current IP range(s) in case regular records expire when a next sock pops up.  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 14:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if we are allowed to do that. I'm need Checkusers for advice.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * There's no justification for a check. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:03, 27 May 2017 (UTC)