Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liliana Verdiana Levy/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

   https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princess_Fawzia-Latifa_of_Egypt&diff=prev&oldid=1030793964 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faika_Sadek&diff=prev&oldid=1028305331 (includes edit war) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faika_Sadek&diff=prev&oldid=1028334232

Diane Molly Handerson was blocked for repeatedly adding unrelated cats to BLPs and edit waring Sarah Laura Bullher is readding the removed cats back to BLPs (apologies if the diffs are not correct, this is my first Sockpuppet investigation) Sciencefish (talk) 13:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It does indeed seem likely that the accounts belong to one person. There may be a WP:CIR issue here. I originally blocked Diane Molly Handerson for one month on the assumption that they might not be aware of their talkpage and the many warnings on it. I supplied a link to the talkpage in the block log and encouraged them, in my block notice, to respond. Perhaps they still didn't find the page, or perhaps they were daunted by the prospect of dealing with the warnings, and simply created a new account instead. I'm not sure what to do, but I propose blocking Sarah Laura Bullher per WP:DUCK while leaving Diane Molly Handerson at large (as luck [?] would have it, their one-month block has just expired) and continue to hope that they'll communicate. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:10, 23 July 2021 (UTC).
 * I agree these are almost certainly the same person. One standout piece of evidence is that both accounts have been creating "people of xxx descent" categories.  But, if Bishonen is willing to AGF, then I'm certainly also willing to do so, so I'll close this with no action taken.  I do wonder if we should set up archiving for User talk:Diane Molly Handerson and force everything that's currently there to be archived.  Maybe it'll be less intimidating if they start with a fresh talk page? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Victoria Hill Andrews: Special:Contributions/Victoria_Hill_Andrews In this article you can see the three socks: and here: Liliana Verdiana Levy: Special:Contributions/Liliana_Verdiana_Levy In this article you can Diane Molly Handerson and Liliana Verdiana Levy: and here:

Diane Molly Handerson was blocked for repeatedly adding unrelated cats to BLPs and edit waring, Sarah Laura Bullher readded the removed cats back to BLPs Victoria Hill Andrews is repeating the same behavior with the same articles. Liliana Verdiana Levy is another user account blocked for the same behavior, I'm am including it as it is clearly another SP of Diane Molly Handerson Sciencefish (talk) 10:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I've blocked Victoria without tags. Please move case to Liliana Verdiana Levy and tag everyone accordingly. Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * While deleting some categories per G5, I noticed recently created Georgina Gibern (added to list), whom I will block in a moment without tags. I am therefore requesting a CU before this case is put to bed.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry to keep doing this piecemeal, but I went back and looked some more at the G5s I did, and I noticed Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hus12345 (despite the large number of accounts, there is no case). Behaviorally, although the usernames are different, it looks like a slam dunk behaviorally to me. I realize they are all stale, but it still might be a good idea to consolidate everything under Hus12345. It certainly reinforces the CU request.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Victoria Hill Andrews and Georgina Gibern ✅, no further unblocked accounts visible. Don't think CU can say anything about whether this is connected to Hus12345. ST47 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I found an account in the Hus12345 category with log data available. The cases are to be related. ST47 (talk) 00:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagged confirmed socks and master; all accounts already blocked, closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  14:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Moved case to oldest account and retagged socks (sorry, didn't notice until after I'd archived...) Spicy (talk) 03:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This new user has several of the "tells" of Liliana Verdiana Levy's known socks, including the creation of "people of xxx descent" categories, and of course the type of account name. Bishonen &#124; tålk 14:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ to . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 03:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagged, closing. Spicy (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Very obviously the same practices and username type as all the previous. I already blocked per WP:DUCK Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Reporting for completeness only. I already blocked per WP:DUCK. Please tag, I'm a little short of time. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC).
 * Tagged, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
same user name format, category additions WP:DUCK. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marsha_Vadhanapanich&diff=prev&oldid=1078612326 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kylie_Padilla&diff=prev&oldid=1078612906 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tunku_Abdul_Rahman_(1933–1989)&diff=prev&oldid=1078613618 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ning_Baizura&type=revision&diff=1078612533&oldid=1057895993 Sciencefish (talk) 12:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I see the usual "tells" of Liliana Verdiana Levy and her known socks. Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC).
 * Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 22:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Obvious sock of prolific sockpuppeteer, with the usual tells. Listing for the record only. This can be closed. Bishonen &#124; tålk 17:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Reporting for the record only. This can be closed. I'll block and tag. Bishonen &#124; tålk 17:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC).
 * , patrolling admins can close SPIs. Closing for you. Bbb23 (talk) 18:03, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I know they can, but I never remember how! Thank you, Beeb. Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC).