Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LisaLambe01/Archive

23 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

made extensive edits to Lisa Lambe, and has claimed on User talk:LisaLambe01 to be the actual subject of the article. (See this.) The user's COI was brought to her attention and several edits she made to the article were reverted as being unsourced or puffery. Ms Lambe appears to be trying to downplay her past involvement with Celtic Woman and play up her new solo career, and has repeatedly removed or changed the image on the article. When her actions were brought to the attention of WP:COIN her editing on the page stopped. But then, recently, appeared and has made identical edits at Lisa Lambe, including removal of the article image and attempts to "soften" the article by referring to Ms Lambe as "Lisa" through the article. I believe the fact that Uncletom has come here for no purpose other than to effect the changes that Ms Lambe01 could not effect herself is a clear indication of either outright sock puppetry or meat puppetry. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:05, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I thought they might be socks, but probably meatpuppets. I would support checkuser though. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ✅. I've blocked/tagged the puppet. I've taken no action against the master because they haven't edited since May 7. I won't close this, though, in case a clerk wishes to take action.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've left a warning for the master account. Mike V • Talk 20:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)