Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lisawalsh/Archive

27 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A large-scale amount of edit-warring on San Buenaventura de Potano. The master was reverted by a user, and then the first IP reverted back to the masters' version. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * DalvarMartinez Reverted master edit,  back to master edit.  User reverted sockpuppet (not confirmed),  user reverts.


 * 162.228.4.175 - After reverting to masters version multiple times, the user has engaged in large-scale edit-warring against another IP, 172.56.29.250 to keep it as the masters version..


 * 98.18.151.139 - Used only for 3 edits, which have all been to support the master., ,.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Seems like I chose the wrong master. Pinging Coffee since they protected the article. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

If they are confirmed, then you forgot the blocks and tags. Cheers, Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I am a bit confused. I encountered sockmasters which were blocked temporarily, however usually the IPs and socks are indeffed. Could you explain this? Thanks, Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All 3 listed accounts are ✅. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 08:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * not at all. It's called a process. I only block after long term large sockmasters who need to be blocked immediately. It ensures an extra level of scrutiny. And maybe a boost to the EDITCOUNTIS for the admin who does block -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 15:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I moved the case to the name of the oldest account (Lisawalsh). I also indeffed all the accounts and blocked the active IP for a month. Nothing more to do, so I'm closing this. DeltaQuad is a checkuser, her role is to make a technical analysis and to post results. She may block the accounts if she chooses so, but Checkusers usually leave blocking and tagging to SPI clerks.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  18:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

29 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Personal attack on opposing edit-warrier, Veritas20132014 by the IP.


 * Gamma - Personal attack. The 162.228.4.175 IP that was blocked recently restored his comment. Also adding the e-mail that the previous puppets used in their dispute on the talk page..

I feel like 1 edit isn't perfectly enough, so requesting CheckUser for confirmation about Gamma. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account is at best. Use behavior. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 17:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you provide a diff of "previous puppets adding the e-mail"?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocking GammaTestLab as a suspected sock and closing. The IP is already blocked.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)