Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lizzie112079/Archive

23 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility



Lizzie hit 3R last night over a single revert back to 7k of nonsense. Various editors took the material back out as discussion is ongoing on talk page. Today, the IP show up and puts the exact same 7k of material back in, conveniently saving Lizzie from violating 3RR. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: It's possible that both are socks of, so I added userlinks there. I'm not sure how to rewrite this so that Indiggo77 is the suspected sockmaster, which seems more likely, actually.  It's the same material being edit-warred over in the article, so seems likely all three editors are the same, esp. since the most recent two only appeared after Indiggo77 was indeffed for legal threats.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: I didn't see this before: Sockpuppet investigations/Indiggo77, where CU was declined on the basis of stale accounts. However, I would still like a CU to consider a check just on the two recent accounts, Indiggo77 and Lizzie112079, neither of which is stale right now.  Thanks&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

They are obviously related. Given the unpopularity of the twins (who claimed themselves singers and actors but don't have any discography nor any major cameo) and fewer than 30 page views per day, who would persistently put 7k of nonsense to the page Indiggo? And in response to, because appeared after the SPI case was was declined in another thread Sockpuppet investigations/Indiggo77, I could only add the info of  after the decline which explains why administrators were not aware of the new offender, I think starting another investigation on the new suspected puppets here is a good idea. BigCat82 (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

This appears to be another Indiggo77 / Lizzie112079 sock puppet: Dan de Lint.63.247.160.139 (talk) 06:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Another new account that immediately picked up at Indiggo after registration, exactly like what did.  is more likely though, as  can at least talk in the article talk page while  and  were next to impossible to communicate with.  and  kept pushing the same 7K unsourced materials as if they were copied from the same template, and due to the page protection the edit patterns of  is yet to be seen and compared. I just added his account above for the current SPI. BigCat82 (talk) 18:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Lizzie112079 and Indiggo77 appear to be technically ❌ to each other. Dan de Lint is . . T. Canens (talk) 18:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Chances are that all of these accounts are related (possibly meatpuppetry) however given the CU results and that none of the accounts/IP has edited for a while I'm closing with no action. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)