Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lockean One/Archive

16 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Lockean One was blocked on 6 April 2014. On 15 April, User:Mabel Velástegui, created 29 January, comes to the libertarianism article, making the same edits which were the single purpose of Lockean One's account. In fact, Lockean One often made contentious claims about the grammar in the lead of the article in service to his anti-left-libertarian agenda, once starting a(nother very long, pointless) discussion thread about "Suggested alternative to equivocation and faulty grammar in lead" Now a user speaking in broken English is complaining about the grammar in the lead and removing left-libertarian content from the lead. The new user has 16 minor edits made in January on unrelated topics. &mdash; goethean 12:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Lockean Redux is a self-proclaimed sock, probably created in order to take the scent off of User:Mabel Velástegui.

Hmmm...perhaps this is a case of meatpuppetry. Accounts exist at Commons and Wikinews also.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Not enough there to block, could a CU please check from confirmation please. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Mabel Velástegui appears to be ❌ to the other two, who are ✅ matches to each other. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Both confirmed accounts are blocked and tagged. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:37, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

13 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Demanding incivility, right-wing libertarian single-purpose account, demands removal of left-libertarian material from Libertarianism (exact same agenda as User:Lockean One). Account created two days after previous sock was blocked. &mdash; goethean 12:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Considering that the previous case involved mistaken MEAT, requesting CU to verify before taking action. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * CU result is w/r/t IP addresses used by  and .  Sorry.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Behavioural evidence suggests Al Bunker is the same individual as Lockean One (and ). Accordingly I have blocked the account indefinitely. I also tagged. This is now and can be archived by the next clerk.  AGK  [•] 18:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)