Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Logoboy95/Archive

Report date April 10 2009, 10:09 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * Evidence submitted by AussieLegend (talk)

User:Logoboy95returns is suspected to be a new username belonging to User:Logoboy95, who was blocked indefinitely in 2005, created to avoid the indefinte block. The possibility of Logoboy95returns being Logoboy95 was raised on Logoboy95returns' talk page. His response did not deny the charge.

I concede that evidence is a bit thin, but the failure to deny that he is Logoboy95, the similarity between the names implying that he is Logo95boy and the fact that Logo95boy was blocked 3 times before being blocked indefinitely does, in my opinion, warrant an investigation. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I should probably also point out that Logo95boyreturns has breached WP:3RR today on 3 separate occasions:

He did stop when warned though. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Winniethepoohandchristmastootitle.jpg -
 * File:Bootoyoutoowinniethepoohtitle.jpg -
 * File:Winniethepoohandchristmastootitle.jpg -


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by AussieLegend (talk) 10:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * for two reasons. (1) is very stale as it was blocked back in 2005, making CheckUser pointless. (2) Because this clearly passes the duck test.  Tiptoety  talk 17:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * While it is rather clear that is a sock of, I am only going to block for 24 hours seeing as Logoboy95returns has began to make some good edits, and there is no need not to assume good faith and give this guy a second chance. As such, I have only blocked him for the revert warring over the image tags.  Tiptoety  talk 17:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

31 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See immediately after block of, which was blocked as a sock of this master. The IP openly identified in edit summaries as Logoboy95.  General Ization  Talk   19:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The registered user denies that they are a sock, and in fact templated the IP several days ago with .  The user's edits, other than the one linked above, appear legitimate.  The user claims their account was hacked by the sockpuppeteer, who presumably is the user of the IP.  I encouraged them to offer evidence here but they have not done so as yet.  General Ization   Talk   19:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * If hacked, the BenGriswald account has been compromised and an indef would likely be appropriate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Please see also, currently blocked 2w on 21 July for harassment, but many edits are identical to the one made by the IP mentioned above, attacks same targets (including BenGriswald) and .  General Ization  Talk   01:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Admin action needed - The account is either a sock (as he claims here) or is compromised (as he claims here). Either way, he needs to be indeffed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Done, closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)