Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lolla lola/Archive

Report date February 19 2009, 15:41 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by  Dloh  cierekim


 * Recreation by of deleted articles previously created by indef blocked User:Lolla lola. See Special:DeletedContributions/Lolla_lola. See Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lolla lola. If you compare the user names there's a pattern of unrandom randomness.  Dloh  cierekim  15:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

seems to be an obvious SPA sock (already blocked some months ago). -- Kanonkas :  Talk 16:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users
 * After taking a serious look through the deleted contribs I would recommend a CheckUser being done to possibly find more socks. I've blocked under the duck clause. -- Kanonkas :  Talk  16:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * - See Kanonkas's comment above. ——  nix eagle email me 18:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Per Kanonkas.  Syn  ergy 23:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Mika-rico-giovi hasn't shared an IP with anyone, and all the others in the suspected sock category are. -- Versa geek  04:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC) -- Kanonkas :  Talk 14:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Evidence submitted by Flowerpotman
Pretty much a duck. Creation of CHIACIG ALFREDO DON article, which is another in a long line of hoax articles for members of a crime family created by socks of Lolla Iola; in particular, articles by this title or a similar title have been created by and, both Lolla lola socks.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;(t) 23:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Blocked and tagged. NW ( Talk ) 04:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)