Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lolnove/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Account was created by sock puppeteer directly. From user creation log: "  11:04, 4 December 2017 User account Job1234hibob (talk | contribs) was created by Lolnove (talk | contribs) and password was sent by email (becase ihave useful info)  " --Jack Frost (talk) 11:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please block the new sock indefinitely. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked and tagged the unblocked account. I tagged the others. The master is Gaylord9000. Please move the case.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If it's all the same to you, I'd prefer to leave the case here. The three were registered close enough together and were inactive enough that it doesn't seem absolutely essential to treat any one of them as the master, and I'd rather not give visibility to an offensive username like that if I can help it. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I never thought of Gaylord as an offensive name. It can be used as a "normal" surname or first name. Nor did he make homophobic comments, just garden variety vandalism and puerile personal attacks. Besides being the oldest account, the other reason I liked him as the master was he was the only one of the three accounts that actually made edits. Job1234hibob made none, and Lolnove only tripped the edit filter. All that said, it's no big deal. If you want to leave it as is, that's okay. However, please retag the accounts with Lolnove as the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged the unblocked account. I tagged the others. The master is Gaylord9000. Please move the case.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If it's all the same to you, I'd prefer to leave the case here. The three were registered close enough together and were inactive enough that it doesn't seem absolutely essential to treat any one of them as the master, and I'd rather not give visibility to an offensive username like that if I can help it. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I never thought of Gaylord as an offensive name. It can be used as a "normal" surname or first name. Nor did he make homophobic comments, just garden variety vandalism and puerile personal attacks. Besides being the oldest account, the other reason I liked him as the master was he was the only one of the three accounts that actually made edits. Job1234hibob made none, and Lolnove only tripped the edit filter. All that said, it's no big deal. If you want to leave it as is, that's okay. However, please retag the accounts with Lolnove as the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * It's precisely because of the puerile nature of there edits that made me think that Gaylord isn't just a name in this context. Re-tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC)