Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lovegun50/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This person has made only edits to templates, edits which cause far-reaching (but reversible) damage to other pages. The first edit that I know of, by 43.239.205.197, was to which came to my attention at Village pump (technical). The second and third edits that I know of were made by Lovegun50 to and also came to my attention in the same VPT thread. The common target - Template:Human timeline - is the only connection that I am aware of between 43.239.205.197 and the rest of those listed above. The others that I am reporting have made these vandalism edits: These users are linked to Lovegun50 by their shared use of this image in their edits. Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 00:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Kristine16 made two consecutive edits to
 * Destroyer100 made two non-consecutive edits to Template:Graphical timeline and
 * Drlove2017 made one edit to
 * Beth2017 made one edit to

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please compare the accounts to identify sleepers. Sro23 (talk) 05:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other:
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other and very to everyone else:
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * These are all on the same wireless provider. It's not easy for me to locate sleepers; this is a large ISP.  The oldest I found was Ratkiller2017.  It seems kind of counterproductive to tag them, though; this is probably going to turn into an LTA case.  I'm not sure what would be the best way to combat this, but edit filters are probably worth considering. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)