Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lu3ke/Archive

30 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Self-confessed sockpuppet used for WP:BLOCKEVASION. "My original account can no longer edit, so therefore in order to continue to fix vandalism and perform other edits, I was forced to open a new one." Diffs,. Continues to edit war to insert favoured (unreferenced, against consensus) content at MigrationWatch UK. Keri (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-- GB fan 10:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have also blocked two IP addresses, and  as they stated they were Augenblink also.  -- GB fan 10:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * and now . -- GB fan 11:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * also  -- GB fan 13:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Nothing more to do here. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

01 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * Special:Contributions/213.234.29.96
 * Special:Contributions/96.53.122.38
 * Special:Contributions/201.249.43.131
 * Special:Contributions/201.249.43.131


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious sock. diff — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Added Special:Contributions/213.234.29.96 for messing with this case's archive page, obvious sock. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 14:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

May I also make you aware that following a tidy little search of the User Creation Log, I have come across a whole batch of users with nicks so exceptionally close to the ones already used, they're practically spoken for. I'm watching them like a hawk for any pickup. What does the Fish say? &#124; Woof! 14:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I wonder if the name and timing is enough to block them? Listing some anyways:


 * -- used for block evasion
 * -- used for block evasion
 * -- used for block evasion
 * -- used for block evasion
 * -- used for block evasion


 * — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Spot on, they were some of the ones I was watching. Do you want me to find the others and tag as suspects? What does the Fish say? &#124; Woof!  15:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, looking back through the UCL, I think that was probably it. What does the Fish say? &#124; Woof!  15:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Added Special:Contributions/96.53.122.38. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Added Special:Contributions/201.249.43.131. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

. I don't think there's a whole lot that could be served by CU'ing this. What does the Fish say? &#124; Woof! 14:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It is definitely a duck, but see my conversation with Bbb23. -- GB fan 14:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This seems needlessly time-consuming, doesn't it? All I'm trying to do is repair a single act of vandalism on a single wikipedia page. Your behaviour is needlessly disruptive. -- Augenblink — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.249.43.131 (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * An admin is needed to indeff Augenblinkdrei.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. --Neil N  talk to me 14:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

03 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK; name; identical edits to previous socks eg /  Keri (talk) 14:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

04 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK; identical editing WP:BLOCKEVASION
 * at English Democrats puppet 1 puppet 2  puppet 3

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nothing to do here. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

04 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK; identical editing, WP:BLOCKEVASION
 * at English Democrats puppet 1 puppet 2  puppet 3  This puppet  Keri (talk) 18:37, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, brand new account posting to support socs at Talk:English Democrats Keri (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the semi-protection; I've adjusted the far-right vs right wing edits to the status quo ante bellum. Lu3ke started adjusting this 21 May by the looks of it. Keri (talk) 19:04, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:57, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked one week and semi-protected the article for the same. Closing.
 * Indeffed account also.

05 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK edit at MigrationWatch UK. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked as an obvious duck and protected article for a year. -- GB fan 11:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

03 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK. Returns to same pages with all his/her socks.
 * 1) Peiter Zatko Lu3ke: Augenblinkauch: Blinkenblink: Geddyfence:
 * 2) Cult of the Dead Cow Lu3ke:Augenblink: Geddyfence:
 * 3) Russian militaria Lu3ke: Augenblinkauch: Geddyfence:

Keri (talk) 14:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - per provided diffs.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:35, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * - Courcelles (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, and blocked:, , and . Courcelles (talk) 21:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I've tagged them. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar username to previous sock and resumption of same behaviour at MigrationWatch UK. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Nice to see you again, hope you've had a good intervening year! As I said, as long as I'm able to, I'll continue to repair the repeated acts of vandalism to the MigrationWatch UK page. And, of course, I categorically reject any accusations of "sockpuppetry" as baseless. This is currently my only active account. --BlinkAuchenBlink (talk) 13:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It was good thanks. This might be the only account you are using, but you are using it to evade a block. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, feel free to delete any other accounts. Or just unblock my original one, and then this silliness won't be necessary.  Or, I guess, don't.  Or lock down the page for another year or ten, I can set my calendar appropriately. Otherwise?  I'll keep defending the site against people who engage in anti-WP behaviour. To do any less would be a serious breach of ethics.  --BlinkAuchenBlink (talk) 13:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Your additions, as before, were unsourced. Thanks to your actions, the article has now been protected indefinitely. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That's utter nonsense; they were absolutely NOT unsourced. They were exhaustively cited.  Unfortunately, one symptom of the repeated vandalism was to remove those citations.  As for the page being blocked from being edited by Wikipedia editors "indefinitely"... well, sounds like a great victory for you, the vandal, then, isn't it?  I'll keep an eye on it from time to time, just in case someone with more respect for WP re-assesses this, of course. But, until then, have fun pushing your biases and prejudices on ordinary Wikipedia viewers, I suppose.   --BlinkAuchenBlink (talk) 14:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I seem to remember your source being a personal blog. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)