Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LuckyBretzel/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

What ties the 2 accounts together are a.) the focus on one article ((G)I-dle), and b.) the similar wording in edit summaries. This edit from the master has the edit summary "I added the informations regarding a certain petition regarding the departure of ex-(G)I-IDLE, Seo Soo-Jin", while this edit from the sock has this: "I added informations following the departure of Seo Soo-Jin and the réaction of the fandom following the event". Both edit summaries sound exactly the same and both say "added informations". wizzito &#124;  say hello!  10:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

at least one of the accounts should be blocked per sock policy, right? Lucky created the account some time after they had received 3 warnings for DE, so it's clear they attempted to 'start anew' or such. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  14:35, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Maybe, but I'm leaving this for someone else to decide whether blocks / warnings are the most appropriate. If good faith is assumed it could be seen as a lost password situation. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think so imho, as Volpez was created 1 minute after this talk page comment by the master. wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  14:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I left uw-agf-sock for the newer account. The edits look like typical newbie stuff and I don't think this merits a block. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 01:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)