Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lui2021/Archive

09 May 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious sock is obvious Darkness Shines (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Bugger, how can I withdraw this? The master has over 500 edits :o( Darkness Shines (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Too late; I've already commented. It doesn't matter how many edits the sock and the master have; the investigation will work equally well or equally badly regardless of whom you call the master and whom you call the sock.  Nyttend (talk) 20:27, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I've just blocked 1721 for a week for copyvios — s/he repeatedly made unattributed copy/paste moves of Abismo de pasión to Abismo de Pasión. Note that 2021 has been concentrating on Abismo de pasión; between the similar editing patterns and the usernames, I'm sure that these are the same person.  Nyttend (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You can block 2021 for copyvios as well, he created this Mark Lyons by copy and pasting from here Darkness Shines (talk) 03:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I would like to point out that he also posts a lot on incorrect information in several articles. If said telenovela hasn't aired in Mexico, he adds "coming soon-present", and that info shouldn't be considered as reliable until Televisa announces an official airdate. Platinum Star (talk) 05:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ,, , ,.
 * This guy's grammar is... rather bad... He mainly edits anything related to Abismo de pasion. Mark Tacher and Salvador Zerboni were created by him, and from what I can see, they look like machine translations. Platinum Star (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * As Darkness pointed out, he's also responsible for posting copyvio material in AdP. Sadly, the edits were deleted after I reported that problem last month. Platinum Star (talk) 05:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * One-week block for 2021 per DS's links and comments. Since both users are currently blocked, I've left a note about using their talk pages and helpme to enable comments to be copied over here.  Nyttend (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Less trouble for Abismo de pasión. Platinum Star (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, it looks like our friend decided to create a new account. He's not vandalizing now, but if he starts his usual pattern, then I'm going to start giving him warnings. Platinum Star (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - T. Canens (talk) 00:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ A straight match that Lui2021, Lui1721 and Lui1791 are the same. - Mailer Diablo 01:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Master already blocked - socks reblocked indef and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

24 May 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same as the last one, creating a duplicate article Darkness Shines (talk) 22:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep, I notified Nyttend when I spotted this. What's so bad about "Abismo de pasion" being in lowercase letters? It's presented like that in Televisa's website, yet he keeps creating a duplicate article "Abismo de Pasion". I propose a permanent protection for all articles remotely related to Abismo de pasion (mainly actors and actresses). Platinum Star (talk) 22:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to block per WP:DUCK without waiting for checkuser, but that would mean that we wouldn't have reason to check for sleepers. Pasión is a redirect to pasión, and I've fully protected the redirect for a month; given past events, when protection expires, it's either going to be ignored and thus open to editing as it should be, or it will be a good honeypot.  No need for full protection for articles, as they should be open to editing.  Nyttend (talk) 02:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ as a match to the accounts in the archive. I would think the master would need to be blocked again too. TN X Man 16:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Master gets 3 weeks, next should indef. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  17:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

11 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lui2021/Archive

Not the first time he creates sockpuppet accounts. Platinum Star (talk) 04:56, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Good god really? Compare user contributions. When it is this obvious diffs are not really needed. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There is this recent posting by a checkuser which clarifies this request. If they are so easy to see then it shouldn't be a problem to produce diffs. Also, please note the edit notice for SPI cases.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Decline CU but blocking sock based on similarities and indeffing master. Closing.

28 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Creates duplicate article pages, username obviously looks similar. Platinum Star (talk) 08:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sleeper check and IP block please. T. Canens (talk) 06:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅, didn't see any other accounts. . WilliamH (talk) 13:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Closed, since the sockpuppets are already blocked and tagged. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

30 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets

This guy will never learn.Platinum Star (talk) 07:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checked per a request, but there were no sleepers. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sock blocked for the usual obvious reasons, no sleepers, closing until next time Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)