Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Luis Oida/Archive

Evidence submitted by Vertigo Acid
User doesn't appear to "get it". Has some good faith edits but appears to think wikipedia is some sort of social networking site, and "writes" back and forth to himself on his assorted talk and user pages. The main account has already been blocked as a compromised account. Seems pretty self evident based on the revision histories there. Vertigo Acid (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I also believe that Lamb99 and Goat999 are also involved, but it's unclear whether that might be a separate pair of puppets or directly related. Vertigo Acid (talk) 03:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

This is an outrage. I have been fighting vandalism for a while now, and have using Huggle efficiently. Now I come to see that people believe that I am a sockpuppet. Goat999 is my friend, and our religion forbids us to go against the rules of anything. Neither of us would do any such thing to hurt Wikipedia. We believe in what you are doing, and hope that Wikipedia becomes the most successful encyclopedia in the world. Goat999 has not been on Wikipedia recently, because of his work on the website WikiAnswers. I have been fighting vandalism. We are different people. We are just good friends. I do not have anything to say about the others, however. Please, remove me and Goat999 from this and let us use Wikipedia freely and fight vandalism on Wikipedia. Lamb99 (talk) 02:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe you are right. Sorry about that. See my comment(s) below. Samwb123T (R)-C-E 23:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for supporting me. I was really hurt and scared when I saw the person who welcomed me turning against me. I thought it was all over. I've never been in a situation like this before. It's really scary but exciting at the same time. Lamb99 (talk) 01:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Well, Lamb and Goat are obvious ducks. agree with MuZemike, not how i wanted it worded anyway. Also note, the Heading on the top of the talk pages of most of the accounts are exactly the same. And the Sandbox link on Aca31 heading found here links directly to lamb99's sandbox. The same thing goes with User:Luis M. Oida heading. I am also going to add User:Spottedtail to the bunch because that accounts contributions are very strange. wiooiw (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I am also adding this ip this one and this one. Their edits speak for themselves. wiooiw (talk) 20:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

I knew it! I asked Goat on their talk page, and they said no, they were just good friends with Lamb. This is obvious deception. Samwb123T (R)-C-E 21:17, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I think Goat and Lamb are right. They are separate people, and Luis Oida just copied their userpage menu. Samwb123T (R)-C-E 23:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

You know why that happened, the links on the sandboxes, because that user obviously copied it from Lamb99's user page and forgot to change the name to his/her username. That doesn't prove at all that this user knows him. Also, Lamb99 and I are separate people, no doubt about that. We don't even know this Luis Oida. Goat999 (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Regarding just Goat999 and Lamb99: Looking at behavior evidence and along with other things, Goat999 might be right. Both lamb and goat do not seem to have the same behavior with the "myspace/blog" deal. And when things like this is done, It could have been a simple case of Luis Oida trying add more to the "blog". Also note if they share the same ip, i haven't seen any real abuse per wp:share. wiooiw (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * So, are you going to let Goat999 and I go? Lamb99 (talk) 22:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I only presented evidence, its pretty much a clerk's or checkuser's decision with what to do with this case. If both of you are innocent of abusing WP:SOCK then there really isn't a lot to be worried about, right? wiooiw (talk) 23:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * True that. Lamb99 (talk) 01:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Is the only way that we can prove that we aren't sock puppets recording ourselves. Goat999 (talk) 11:19, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Spottedtail is a WikiAnswers who knew us from there, and then we told her our Wikipedia user account names, and she created an account. For proof, here is the link: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/User:Spottedtail Goat999 (talk) 23:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Self-endorsing for CU attention because it's possible a couple of the accounts may not be socks but separate people. –MuZemike 19:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Both Luisrocks and Luis M. Oida have been indefinitely blocked as clear socks. –MuZemike 19:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

✅ =

., , and are ❌. J.delanoy gabs adds 18:19, 27 May 2010 (UTC)