Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Luisjphy/Archive

29 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Their only contributions appear to be their promotional userpages spamming the same link, which should probably be blacklisted as an aside. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Added another account that is also spamming the same link in the same way (if memory serves, this is the same link indeed).Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * They're all (now blocked) throw away spam accounts. I did a quick check for sleepers but didn't find any.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * - I blocked them all based on WP:DUCK. Endorsing the CU to check for sleepers.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ooops, editing conflict. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That was indeed an amazing edit conflict!-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)