Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lumaras/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All three accounts seem to me like clear SPAs. Multiple brand-new accounts, creating a section on Talk:John Carmack to discuss his divorce. Not 100% sure if this is actual sockpuppetry (i.e. disruption) or just a new user who keeps forgetting their password.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_Carmack&oldid=1063195148

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Carmack&diff=next&oldid=1063165618&diffmode=source

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Carmack&curid=38368&diff=1063209855&oldid=1063206391&diffmode=sourceLoafiewa (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is technically ❌. If this account is determined a sock through behavioral evidence and is blocked, there exists a confirmed account to this account. I am not mentioning this because this is not a violation of the sockpuppetry policy by using it, but this account would need to be blocked if this account is blocked.
 * and are . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:05, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing without action. This is just as well explained by several people related to the subject trying to help out to update the marital status and I have a few things on top of the CU evidence to make me less sure about them being one person. I believe the meatpuppetry issue will be resolved when the content issue is resolved, but that should be taken outside of SPI. please leave reverting socks to after it's proven or if there are other reasons to revert. --Trialpears (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)