Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lumbercane/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * There's a similarity between the names with the "V V" theme.VeeraVijayapandi vs. Vijayviji1994.
 * Both seem to be here to vandalise film articles.
 * VeeraVijayapandi: Fabricated 203 crore at Viswasam here, here, here. Decides that 181.45 crore is "truth" at Nerkonda Paarvai here and  here
 * Vijayviji1994: Pushing 203.30 at Viswasam here, Decides that 181.45 crore is "truth" at Nerkonda Paarvai here.

On the basis of these, I think it's pretty ducky that one is a sock of the other, and created a new account to evade scrutiny. I am curious if a CU might discover another account. I somewhat suspect  because he had some areas of interest with these, but I don't have strong evidence. Lumbercane did have an almost hostile reaction at Viswasam to the idea that a range of opinions on gross should be presented. And he deleted similar content here, here, etc. That's similar, but not exactly what the other two accounts were doing. If he is found to be a sock, he would likely be considered the master, as that is the oldest account. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please confirm/sleeper check. The SandDoctor  Talk 00:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * VeeraVijayapandi, Vijayviji1994 and are all, you could probably stretch that to , to each other. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:40, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Case moved to eldest account (Lumbercane). The SandDoctor  Talk 17:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * suspected. Closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 17:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

The very similar edit request spamming on Talk:Valimai almost rises to the point of quacking... If only the last two are connected, then this is also block evasion RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to each other:
 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 17:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)


 * is to the group of confirmed accounts, with my gut saying that these are not the same person. Kind of similar geolocation (same wide area in a large country known for bad geolocation), but different devices and ISPs. I would suggest, without strong behavioural connections, that MovieBuffIndia be considered unrelated. A check of MovieBuffIndia brought up no accounts that can be linked via CU. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 17:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * - VeeraVijayapandi is blocked as a sock of . Please determine whether a move to that case is appropriate. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 17:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Very similar changes at Viswasam as the existing Lumbercane group. - Could an adminclerk please merge this case to Sockpuppet investigations/Lumbercane? Thanks, --Jack Frost (talk) 11:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Jack Frost - ✅. Setting status to 'Open'; if this is not the status that this report should be set to, please feel free to change it.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * . --Jack Frost (talk) 11:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * assuming you intend to take no action with MovieBuffIndia? Spicy (talk) 04:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * , correct, no action in relation to at this time. Thanks, --Jack Frost (talk) 13:19, 11 June 2022 (UTC)