Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lzzy303/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The three wikipedia accounts were created on the same days (mid July 2018), they just keep removing section after section the whole "Communion and Liberation" Wikipedia article and replacing it with no reference or poor sources peacock adverting article, starting from the upper part, the same references are used. Jasmir54 22:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

User:Jasmir54 irritated other people by ignoring other people and not responding to the comment made by in Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and Talk:Communion and Liberation. His "response" was bot like such as "Hi GioA90, I invited you to the Teahouse. Please don't replace contents from articles with content without reliable and independent references and citations. Welcome to Wikipedia". when GioA90 had expressed a lengthy comment on the wording and difference of "court ruling" and "accusation" and citation on both.

For the accused sockmaster and accused sock, i don't see a strong connection, it may need CU if admin and clerk feel this multi-user edit war need to resolve by SPI, which i think Jasmir54 is a block evasion or "black-hand" account instead, as he falsely claimed himself joined wikipedia many year ago, but in fact in  meta:Special:CentralAuth/Jasmir54  it is not. Matthew_hk  t  c  23:42, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi again. Thanks for your comment, where and when exactly I have irritaded someone?

Please keep a civil tone if you desire. I hope you are okay. The sockupuppeter edit warriors were adviced and there is currently and investigation so please wait.

Kind regards^^ Jasmir54 03:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

You've being ignoring my comments for days and are accusing me of using unreliable sources without properly explaining why. This is irritating and does not serve the good of wikipedia, Jasmir54. GioA90 (talk) 12:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Where exactly? I invited you to the Teahouse and say you welcome, you are free to edit whatever you want. Farewell, Jasmir54 05:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi everyone! I looked at the IP used in the investigations and they come from the US, as I am writing from Italy I think it should be easy to see at least I am not a socket puppet. Also you should see that lately I've been only trying to use talk pages and spammed everywhere the points I have (to show also other people how I am trying to be reasonable), but Jasmir54 has ignored every and each of my comments. I am honestly tired of him: he's not constructive and does not answer my points. I've lost any hope of assuming good faith about him (well, the other explanation could be he's a functional illiterate, but that's even worse). I am tired of all this...GioA90 (talk) 09:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

I'd also like someone, please, to check the claims of Jasmir54, as he's babbling about citations, without recognizing that many sourced used are of good quality (we're talking official bibliography of the founder, official documents etc.) while many citations currently used in the page are misused (see the talk page for more: either reporting old articles, when the final trial changed the verdict, or citing things that are actually not present in the source, or citing a book that begins with a "warning: there book is investigative. Trials are ongoing and people should be deemed innocent until the final verdict" without such warning and stating everything as fact). His accusations about citation quality are baseless. GioA90 (talk) 11:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Finally I subscribed to wikipedia because the version I saw was extremely low quality and biased. I can imagine I am not the only one who, seeing the current status of the page, thinks improvements are needed and decides to become an editor...GioA90 (talk) 14:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

You can edit whatever you want, I invited you to the teahouse. Greetings and welcome.

Jasmir54 05:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

The user Jasmir54 is already re-editing everything, ignoring the talk page (only answered to a question by a user "I can help" and went rampage). I am honestly fed up, as he has answered no single question about citations and is still mis-citing things (writing things that are not actually inside the cited material) while has erased all the good work without saying why it was bad. I feel honestly sad about how wikipedia is being unable to properly respond to him! He has never properly answered in the talk page, why no one notices his bad intentions?GioA90 (talk) 20:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

He removed all citations to the official bibliography, but it seems this one ( http://www.bastaitalia.org/comunione-e-liberazione-cl-la-vera-mafia-italiana/ ) is fine to him. It definitely looks like a sketchy website to me and I've never heard of it before...GioA90 (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 18:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)