Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MALIK STAR/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Evidently the same user if we look at the vandalism done by both users. Saqib (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Should be in the opposite order, since MALIK STAR was registered first, but otherwise seem to be the same person.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Both accounts are blocked now, so there's not much point checking them. --Deskana (talk) 12:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * With both already blocked, there's nothing left to do here. Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

FARZI was created after MALIK STAR was blocked for "Deliberate BLP violations; and editing behavior suggests vandalism-only account".. Earlier today, I reported FARZI at WP:AIV after the account made some Deliberate BLP violations to that same BLP to which MALIK STAR was used to edit (such as Ahsan Iqbal). FARZI also left some messages on my talk page and especially this one which indicates the user is here for vandalism purpose only.

Therefore I request for CU and also urge to delete the revisions FARZI made on Ahsan Iqbal and on my talk page here and here because the Urdu language words are very obscene and disgusting. --Saqib (talk) 07:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Further comment, I just found I requested a CU last month Sockpuppet investigations/MALIK STAR/Archive but since both the master and sock was already blocked, my request was declined. But I think it would be good idea to run a CU this time even if FARZI is blocked by the time a CU see this. I assume new sock would be created in the coming days therefore we need to have a track record which will help in the future. --Saqib (talk) 07:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This report obviously needs to be moved.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅. GABgab 15:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Pretty much him, no sleepers. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This is clearly related to User:MALIK STAR as evident from this edit and OR edits to Makhdoom Shahabuddin. The IP user claim to have created a new account so I request a CU and identify his new socks. A sock of master account left some very derogatory and insulting remarks on my talk page a few days back and I request his IP range to be blocked to get rid of his disruptive behaviour on this site in the near future. Saqib (talk) 13:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
We don't publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * . GABgab 18:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

same editing pattern. reinstated the material which was previously added by now blocked IP. Saqib (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
IP edits are now too old. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A SPA created today. same editing pattern. reinstated the material which was previously added by now blocked IP. Saqib (talk) 07:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The user continue to add controversial OR to a BLP. I am just curious why this investigation is not being carried out. . --Saqib (talk) 13:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)