Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MCall063/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

After MCall063 added promotional text to Tokyo DisneySea and Tokyo Disneyland, I undid their edit. Within 15 minutes, 2001:1970:4c60:100:f461:5ac8:e8ea:c4bb reverted on Tokyo DisneySea. I went back and reverted, followed by MCall063 reverting it back. I then left Uw-advert2 on User talk:MCall063 and reverted back, knowing that I could not continue to revert based on WP:3RR. 8 minutes later, the new user User:Bobloblawas pops up, reverts the edit, goes to my talk page and complains that my edits were nonconstructive. After explaining that such content was clearly advertising and was not allowed, User:Bobloblawas then decided to undo edits on pages I created, reverting factual notable information, and making pages inaccurate. I think it is highly unlikely that a new user suddenly turns to Tokyo DisneySea, reverts, and basically try to continue what had been going on, as User:Bobloblawas does. While I know that this is not just a sockpuppet issue, that's where it started out (the conversation on my talk page started as I was writing this) and I'm not sure which other one is most accurate. Elisfkc (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The accounts may be related, i.e., or this may be meatpuppetry. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This looks more like meatpuppetry than sockpuppetry to me. Some of the edit times are quite close together. Meanwhile, has stated he's a student in a course at the moment that is making use of Wikipedia, so we know he's likely talking about Wikipedia and his editing experience with other students. I'm providing MCall063 with a warning about edit warring and I'll block  indefinitely as per WP:NOTHERE given how he followed the filer around and reverted him just to be a nuisance. ~ Rob 13 Talk 03:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)