Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MJfan9/Archive

Report date January 7 2010, 02:31 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by GSK (talk ● evidence)
 * Extremely similar usernames, seems to have had a previous sock . GSK (talk ● evidence) 02:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting comment posted on MJfan9's talk page, which could be interpreted a number of different ways: -- GSK (talk ● evidence) 20:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

no,i have had no contact with him what so ever--Mjfan1 (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by GSK (talk ● evidence) 02:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

– Yes, the usernames are similar, but not necessarily the editing patterns (I remember one of the accounts continuously adding non-free material on his userpage – something the other suspected socks didn't do.). –MuZemike 20:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

is
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

The others are unquestionably ❌. J.delanoy gabs adds 21:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Conclusions