Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/M Meerkat/Archive

Report date December 10 2009, 07:40 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Tessiej has only done two edits and M Meerkat has only edited in the CPA Australia. M Meerkat removed a photograph without a valid reason or discussion and was warned yesterday however today a new account (Tessiej) did the very same thing. Bidgee (talk) 07:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Bidgee (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Bidgee (talk) 07:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

per my comment below. Even if CU comes back positive, I think we're still likely looking at meatpuppetry here (i.e. two people working for this company editing the article). MuZemike 20:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

This looks more like two people from the same company editing the article as opposed to straight sock puppetry. I'm not certain what else would come out of a Checkuser request here. MuZemike 18:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

I'm not going to take any action here. If a person or two can watch this, as there is pretty much a clear COI here, that would be great. I'm not really seeing that they're the same person per my comment above. MuZemike 07:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions