Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maccabee32/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See ANI discussion - checkuser requested by to see if a range block is possible. I also suggest looking for more sleepers. – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  13:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I've just added Maccabee54, also blocked, for the record. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:40, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Maccabee72 also added, for the record. Already blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sorry, open proxies no sleepers. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , my little sniffer says *hmm smells like Sockpuppet investigations/Letscasks maybe* but I'm not running CU since you already did. Drmies (talk) 21:53, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That seems like a reasonable place to archive this. Though actually two other LTA cases also spring to mind. The open proxies (which are now blocked) make it impossible to provide confirmation either way. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ,, you'll note that I threw some blocks around, including one for a proxy. Please have a look: all of this sounds like Letscasks to me, but zzuuzz, if you have other options, let's hear 'em. Letscask is just a big fan of sexism and anticommunism and accusing others of antisemitism (which is funny when it comes to these recent SPLC efforts). Oh, you thought Mikemikev, maybe? Seems different to me. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You know who it reminds me of, pre-dating Lestcasks: and more where that came from, like . But also, having looked closer at the technicals here, I'd suggest it doesn't get archived to Letscasks (though I am also saying Letscasks can't be ruled out). BTW, Sockpuppet investigations/216.118.132.115 has also been suggested, though I also consider that unlikely. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree this does seem like Letscasks, but then again Letscasks probably wasn't his first account either. Let's not worry too much about this troll's identity. Sro23 (talk) 22:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)