Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MachineKeebler/Archive

Evidence submitted by FluffyPug
Starting with this edit on April 29th, these users have been cropping up and reverting the article to this version by user:MachineKeebler. These newly created users, in the span from May to October, have created no other edits except to revert the page to that same version- except for a few edits to the Waffle Iron and Espresso articles- ones that just happen to be frequently edited by Machineebler. Adding to that, these "newly created" accounts all have specific knowledge of Wikipedia's acronym terms, something very unusual for someone who has never edited Wikipedia before. Adding to that, despite the statements about "talking in the talk page", none of these users has put anything down on the talk page- their ONLY notable contributions have been to revert to MachineKeebler's "version". FluffyPug (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by FluffyPug (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

No code letter, but doesn't matter because three new accounts which all revert to the same revision, have similar edit summaries (talk in discuss, see discussion, etc.), and edit the same article with the exception of a few coffee-related articles seems duckish. GrooveDog &bull; i'm groovy. 21:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
Sockmaster blocked 1 month for sock puppetry. Other socks indefinitely blocked and tagged. MuZemike 02:32, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by user:FluffyPug
user:MachineKeebler is currently under a block for using multiple sockpuppets in analog stick. However, after he was blocked two more accounts popped up with the exact same nonexistant edit history, exact same writing style, and the exact same motivation (ie: blanking the majority of the article), reverting the article to MachineKeebler's,. FluffyPug (talk) 15:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by FluffyPug (talk) 15:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Behavioral evidence indicates that they're clearly the same person. See the duck test. GrooveDog &bull; i'm groovy. 19:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
Socks blocked and tagged. Sockmaster already blocked; these socks were part of the same sock puppetry which got the sockmaster blocked in the first place. MuZemike 19:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)