Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Majikalex32/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The suspected master Majikalex32 was blocked first for a day for personal attacks by me, then for a week further by for disruptive editing and personal attacks on Kate Fischer. Immediately, two new suspected ducks (as above) sprung up at the article warring in exactly the same fashion as the suspected master. Request a checkuser to weed out other sleeper accounts. Thanks, Lourdes   13:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. No other accounts seen. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The article Kate Fischer has seen multiple socks in the past. This new editor's first two edits were to revert my edits quoting "consensus" on the talk page mentioning past socks as evidence editors of consensus, quite similar to past sock behaviour (e.g. here). led the blocks last time I presume. Lourdes  06:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

this is a bad faith attack. I was a regular editor on wiki a few years ago but have forgotten my previous password, so created a new login, I only have one account. I believe Lourdes is accusing me of multiple accounts so they can edit a page without consensus, particularly the Kate Fischer wiki bio. if Lourdes believes that entries on Kate Fischers wiki bio should be deleted then perhaps this should be discussed on a noticeboard first, rather than taking liberties and just deleting entries. when I say without consensus there are at least two other admin who believe the entries Lourdes removed are valid and relevant and should be included in the BLP, Lourdes implying on here that the other editors that agree with my opinion are all sock puppets is deliberately misleading Pauly38 (talk) 07:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Through this edit, you added the names of the three editors (who are all confirmed socks) to your comment as evidence of past consensus; this was your fifth edit here, and as per you, you've apparently never interacted with these editors before. You have repeatedly used the term "noticeboard" or "notice board" (with a space) in your various comments The sock  used the exact "notice board" terminology (with a space). The sock master  and others have been blocked for edit warring. You're doing the exact edit warring on the article right now.


 * Further, your edit saying that "Lourdes and her henchmen are just trying to sanitise the page, possibly due to COI", is not just a personal attack, but is so similar to the sockmaster who on Talk:Kate Fischer had just about accused all and sundry of CoI.


 * As much as I can tell, yours is an absolute duck case of a sock. Lourdes   11:29, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Clearly you have a COI about this. like I said I have asked for other editors opinions on the BLP noticeboard. your accusations are unfounded I have no association with any previous editors of this article. there have been several other editors that concur with my opinions. I am not going to argue with you any more Lourdes, you claim ownership. as an experienced editor you should know better than to edit without discussion and consensus Pauly38 (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As probably you know in your past claimed tenure as an editor, you can't accuse editors of COIN without evidence; and if you have evidence, you take that to WP:COIN; and if you splatter various talk pages and forums with such accusations without evidence, you will be blocked. Lourdes   11:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * that's fine. I will wait for other editors and admin to offer their opinions. Pauly38 (talk)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)