Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Makgeeky/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Makgeeky was blocked 31h for disruption on Makhanda (prophet), more specifically POV-pushing a specific cultural/theological narrative (1, 2, 3) and taking a my-way-or-the-highway approach to the article, to the point of trying to PROD it when they were prevented from getting their way. Cue MadGeeky, whose sole edit thus far is to continue doing the same thing that Makhanda got blocked for. I'm asking for a checkuser to confirm whether or not this is an actual sockpuppet, as I suspect there's a concerted campaign to force the Wikipedia article to reflect a specific theological POV. —A little blue Bori v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 06:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - For confirmation, per above request. --Jack Frost (talk) 08:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * . *sigh*, 6 minutes after I endorse CU they decide to make it easy. - Please indef  as a proven sockpuppet, and indef the master for socking to evade a block. Jack Frost (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 331dot handled the blocks, I did the tags. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Pro forma, see below. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Duck exhibiting continued NOTHERE behaviours ., master's block extended to indefinite. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)