Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mandanmishra/Archive

Report date December 30 2009, 16:48 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

After Mandanmishra received final warning about speedy deletion notice removal on Dinman, new user Mdabral was created, and as their first edit, created a duplicate article at Dinaman Wuh  Wuz  Dat  16:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Wuh  Wuz  Dat

IP address removing the same talk page comment previously removed by blocked user Mandanmishra. Block evasion by IP. Wuh Wuz  Dat  14:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Wuh  Wuz  Dat

I dont know what sockpuppetry is. If you do not want to keep a valuable piece of information on a valuable space that derives its value by the vuirtue of information, its your privilege I guess. I sent out what I thought was a reasonable description to a few folks I know to check if that was OK. If one of them decides to use it as he or she could not find the name and created it, will you call that sock puppetry. I think wuhwuzdat is a vindictive checker who has assigned himself or herself the wisdom and power of god.. the discussion may have been civil and polite but he has just gone on accusing rather than looking at any action by a first time writer on wikipedia as an experimentation or done in absence of better knowledge of wiki.. Reminds me of the incident when Skip Gates was harrassed by the cops in Cambridge and teh President of teh uS had to come out to defend him.. wwd sounds like that cop.. Thanks so much
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Sock indefinitely blocked and tagged, sockmaster blocked 2 weeks. –MuZemike 22:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Conclusions