Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Manpreet dhir/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
This seems to be a sock farm interested in promoting Bhaskar Sharma (Physician). Manpreet dhir is already globally locked for spamming and Manpreet09876 is globally locked for lock evasion. In addition to the obvious overlap in interests there are also some obvious stylistic similarities, e.g. Lord Puneet Superstar and Manpreet09876 capitalise every word when writing. Rolex98 writes in a different style, but it's obvious that they're using chat GPT to write their comments and user page.

Requesting checkuser because some of these accounts have been checkuser blocked on the simple English wikipedia, so there may be more accounts I haven't spotted. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 11:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The first diff you've given there to show the linguistic differences is ChatGPT output. You can tell from the style of writing and the tendency to repeat the same point multiple times. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 18:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Blablubbs You can even see where they've customised the output. The ChatGPT output is capitalised correctly, the bits where they've modified the output have the same "every word gets a capital" formatting (e.g. ).
 * I can see we're going to have a problem with spammers flooding AFD with massive AI generated responses that don't address notability or wikipedia policy. That's going to be "fun" for closers to deal with. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 18:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, group 1:
 * to group 1:
 * (Very), group 2:
 * (locked as Manpreet dhir)
 * (created Dr Bhasker Sharma)
 * Groups 1 and 2, but in light of fairly large linguistic differences (compare ), I think we're looking at separate individuals. That said, I don't think it matters much since everyone is editing in evasion of global locks, and coordination of some sort seems fairly evident. . --Blablubbs (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 192.76.8.84: Good catch – I missed the note in your filing for some reason. Ugh, SOCK enforcement in a post-AI world is already shaping up to be really fun. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Tagged Group 1 as proven and Group 2 as suspected. Requested locks for the unlocked accounts. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * (created Dr Bhasker Sharma)
 * Groups 1 and 2, but in light of fairly large linguistic differences (compare ), I think we're looking at separate individuals. That said, I don't think it matters much since everyone is editing in evasion of global locks, and coordination of some sort seems fairly evident. . --Blablubbs (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 192.76.8.84: Good catch – I missed the note in your filing for some reason. Ugh, SOCK enforcement in a post-AI world is already shaping up to be really fun. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Tagged Group 1 as proven and Group 2 as suspected. Requested locks for the unlocked accounts. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * 192.76.8.84: Good catch – I missed the note in your filing for some reason. Ugh, SOCK enforcement in a post-AI world is already shaping up to be really fun. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Tagged Group 1 as proven and Group 2 as suspected. Requested locks for the unlocked accounts. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)