Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marc/Archive

Evidence submitted by Eric
I think all the above usernames might belong to one person using them to repeatedly add the same questionable material regarding one topic, gemmail. The edits are on that article and on Stained glass. If I read WP:SOCK correctly, this behavior meets the criteria under contributing to the same page with multiple accounts.

Eric talk 16:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Marc signed a post on User_talk:Marcmaison referring to that user's edits as his own. (see my next post below)
 * The following post may shed some more light on what I and other editors are contending with: Talk:Gemmail.
 * I was mistaken: I now see that it was in fact Marcmaison who signed the post manually on his talk page as User:Marc(in the middle of the post: page diff) So User:Marc may not be related to the other three after all. Eric talk 16:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Eric talk 16:11, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

., no CU necessary. Tim Song (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Socks indefinitely blocked and tagged. I don't think Marc is involved, as his edits are different than the other three; he is left unblocked. –MuZemike 20:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)