Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marcelhudson/Archive

26 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This IP removed the speedy deletion template from The Athlone Group and gave almost the exact same all capitalized reason for removing the template that User:Marcelhudson used when creating the page. Swimnteach (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Pretty clear case. Persistent recreaton of the same article, and persistent removal of deletion templates, both logged in and logged out. Combine it with comments such as this one, and you have a case where a block is clearly warranted. Indef blocked the user account, 48H block on the IP. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 17:57, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

29 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A focus on supporting the biography of Jojar S Dhinsa, and apparent business associates. Currently that's Mixudo which is an investment in by Dhinsa's. Also promoting other websites registered to Shu Shen in addition to Mixudo: see Mouldings Industry Association and this diff mirroring the previous use of one as a reference in Dhinsa's article. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Hi, Whilst I can understand the logic, if I may explain; I have simply followed a path of interesting reading around the subjects in question and admit they are related. Happy to receive your advice on such edits, as I am not here to cause harm nor disingenuous edits.

Very best regards

M MarcelBrandon (talk) 21:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Might also want to take a look at, who commented in Talk:Disciplined Agile Delivery. The style of writing seems similar to that of Marcel Brandon/Hudson and is an SPA trying to argue against an AFD. Although of course it might be one of his friends/associates. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

In relation to this - I have no idea how/why you would associate me with this user - I have not come accross him/her before. Please justify this comment?

MarcelBrandon (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, wrong article. Carry on. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Given some rather significant differences in style, I'm going to assume that it isn't the same user for now. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

22 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I'm aware this was shut down before, but both have had a strong focus on the Athlone Group related articles (ie, the Athlone Group in its various forms, and Jojar S Dhinsa), and both have curiously similar names. This might sound like a poor argument, and if so, I'm sorry, as I don't have access to more information on the articles that have been worked on by both accounts and deleted, and wasn't aware of this user at the time of the original SPI, but I believe both users may have edited the now-deleted article "Mixudo" in some form or another. "Athlone Group of Companies" was originally proposed by the IP blocked as a sock of Marcelhudson, with that title (although the article was in a substantially different form when released to mainspace.) Lukeno94 (talk) 13:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * In response to Rschen, yes - the fact that the Athlone Group (now deleted) was created as an extensively modified version of the IP blocked as a sock of Marcelhudson, with an identical name. (IP's AFC) (I can't provide diffs for the date of the Athlone Group of Company's creation by MarcelBrandon, as that's now been deleted; should've included em before, oops). Also, the names are INCREDIBLY coincidental for two separate editors with a COI... Lukeno94 (talk) 08:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

As you said yourself, it was closed down because there was no connection. My additions have been fair, and genuine, and frankly do not understand reluctance to see the positive attributes, and notability of a group of high profile people that support a large number of suffering people.

I find the unwarranted negativity quite distasteful. MarcelBrandon (talk) 13:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Marcelhudson is . --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 17:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there any new evidence to consider since the last request? Rschen7754 07:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Declining to take action here. The now-deleted article is very different from the AFC request. Might be meatpuppets, but don't seem like socking is going on. Rschen7754 08:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)