Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marek69/Archive

Report date March 23 2009, 17:17 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Marek69 has admitted this himself to me and others, and is currently blocked for his behavior
 * Evidence submitted by James Tucton (talk)
 * What? His block log is clean . As for "admitted" -- diffs please?
 * Move that this be closed as frivulous and disruptive immediately. The Acemandude5 acount has never edited; the IP reported has made 6 edits -- 5 in early march repairing disambiguation links (and it wouldn't shock me if they were accidentally logged out edits by Marek, so what) and a reversion of vandalism on February 12 . And that's it. Also, the complaining user has admitted on AN/I that he is in fact a sockpuppet of somebody .Bali ultimate (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * And the crowning cherry on the cake is that Marek states on his talk page that Acemandude was created as a mistake as part of account creation. pushthebutton  &#x007C;  go on...  &#x007C;  push it!  18:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

 Syn  ergy 20:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Report date March 24 2009, 19:48 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by AngelFace1966 (talk)

Please look at Pope John Paul II Marek69 is main editor. When he needs a dificult edit he switches to use Can-Dutch who he uses to argue his point. Can-Dutch has basically only edited on Pope John Paul II and he shares the last two ips!! Do you need anymore!!


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Gee - another one of these? A sockpuppetry allegation created by a brand new account against Marek69? Can this one be shut as vandalism as quickly as the last one was dealt with, please? pushthebutton &#x007C;  go on...  &#x007C;  push it!  13:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{delisted}} as an apaprent bad faith request Mayalld (talk) 14:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 14:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Report date March 26 2009, 19:49 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Klaudia2008 (talk)

Look at Pope John Paul II - Clearly Sock puppets!!


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Yet another baseless sockpuppetry allegation against Marek created by a brand-new account. Can this one please go the same way as the preceding ones? pushthebutton &#x007C;  go on...  &#x007C;  push it!  20:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

clearly baseless, bad faith, accusation by a sockpuppet. Mayalld (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions