Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marioluigi187/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similarities in user names + overlap at Draft:Hoy Mas Que Ayer (album) (one created, the other blanked less than an hour later) + registered around the same time DannyS712 (talk) 05:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppetry lists "Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people. Contributing to the same page with clearly linked, legitimate, alternative accounts (e.g. editing the same page with your main and public computer account or editing a page using your main account that your bot account edited) is not forbidden." and the two accounts have both edited the same draft. I thought that they were the same person, and so tagged the page for G7, but the CSD was declined because of the appearance that they are multiple people DannyS712 (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Regardless of intent, the policy suggests that the two editing the same page is inappropriate, since the two aren't clearly linked, and thus is misuse of multiple accounts DannyS712 (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There's no misuse of multiple accounts here. Closing without action. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * - I had archived this, but pointed out that there was still an unanswered question, so I've backed out my archiving and placed this on hold to allow time for that to be addressed. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * to make sure they're aware of my action. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * While the G7 decline is unfortunate, I see no intent to deceive here, hence my conclusion that there's no misuse here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * My take on this is that they're the same person, and also
 * but this is more of a WP:CIR and ignorance of our rules thing than intentional deception. My suggestion is to uw-agf-sock them all and let it go at that.  And  your decline of the G7 was certainly correct by strict reading of WP:G7, but if we accept these are all the same person, then G7 actually does apply.  And for future clerks scratching their heads, there's two different titles, Draft:Hoy Más Que Ayer (album) and Draft:Hoy Mas Que Ayer (album) which only differ by an accent.  -- RoySmith (talk) 00:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * but this is more of a WP:CIR and ignorance of our rules thing than intentional deception. My suggestion is to uw-agf-sock them all and let it go at that.  And  your decline of the G7 was certainly correct by strict reading of WP:G7, but if we accept these are all the same person, then G7 actually does apply.  And for future clerks scratching their heads, there's two different titles, Draft:Hoy Más Que Ayer (album) and Draft:Hoy Mas Que Ayer (album) which only differ by an accent.  -- RoySmith (talk) 00:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * My intent of unarchiving this and putting it on hold was to make sure 's question had a chance to be addressed. It has been, so reclosing. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)