Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mark W. Rocha/Archive

22 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Rocha created an apparent autobiography at AFC. After Rocha was warned about creating autobiographies, WP:SPA account Pccwebofffice copied the article into article space, which Rocha then marked as reviewed. Having seen that and the promotional tone of the article, I tagged it as autobio, in the midst of general edits on the article (including expanding it with info from less-positive coverage of subject.) Pccweboffice was blocked for a username problem, but two other SPA accounts arose, and proceded primarily to remove the autobio tag and the sourced negative content, , , ... and while I was editing this, they were joined by an IP user:. I have attempted to address these users on Talk:Mark W. Rocha, but to no response. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Mark W. Rocha has already been blocked indefinitely, as has Pccweboffice. This edit by Wallabyjenkins followed by this edit a few hours later by  Mac912 is such strong behavioural evidence that I will call WP:DUCK and block them both. SmartSE (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)