Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MarketingDarkglass/Archive

04 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Suspected sockmaster was blocked per after creating Darkglass, which was subsequently speedily deleted. Suspected sockpuppet has re-created the deleted page today, nearly character for character verbatim except for the lack of an infobox. Seems a clear WP:DUCK case, but I want to adhere to proper procedure, and have it on record that a block-evading user with a probable COI is attempting to institute this article. - Vianello (Talk) 23:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Piliescobar indef blocked and tagged as a WP:DUCK for the timing of account creation immediately after MarketingDarkglass' block and deletion of Darkglass, coupled with their mostly duplicate re-creation of Darkglass article. Sockmaster MarketingDarkglass can resume editing if their existing block for WP:SPAMNAME is addressed, so no tagging needed. Nothing left to do.—Bagumba (talk) 09:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)