Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Markomoreno0391/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per common interests on the same pages, such as Template talk:Animation industry in Russia among others (see interaction report) and the same unexplained, disruptive page move at Braveworld (from Braveworld Video). Looks like a duck case to me. Requesting CU to confirm and look for sleepers/older masters if any.  Java Hurricane  14:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.'''
 * I was just explaining to someone the other day that the EIR is almost never enough evidence on its own to block, but geez, in this case it really is. Incredibly niche pages, including in the template talk and category talk namespaces. I cannot imagine any scenario where two different people would want to make these kinds of edits to the same set of pages. Noting that since this SPI was filed, Nhovie0206 was blocked for 31 hours by SuperMarioMan, at which point they seem to have switched to loutsocking on 2001:FD8:3195:9854:0:0:0:0/64, till that range was blocked by EdJohnston.Since there's no history of sockpuppetry prior to this, and it's not clear if the socking (other than the loutsocking) was to evade scrutiny, I don't see cause to indef the master. for:
 * An indefinite sockblock of Nhovie0206.
 * A block of Markomoreno0391 till 20 October to match the block they're already under as an IP.
 * (That said, I think an admin would be within their rights to just indef for WP:CIR.) No reason has been given to suspect an older master or any sleepers (and the decision to loutsock would suggest no sleepers), so in that respect.  -- Tamzin  [cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)


 * . Went with indefinite given the mix of general disruption, socking, and immediate block evasion. Back to you, . --Blablubbs (talk) 08:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Blablubbs. Tagged. Closing. -- Tamzin  [cetacean needed] (she/they) 08:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Resumption of the disruptive editing from this range seen from previous IPs and accounts, including usage of talk pages as sandboxes. /40 already pblocked from one page for said disruption.  Java Hurricane  13:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.'''
 * I don't see any collateral on this range. Still, looks like we can make it a bit narrower than the /40: Everything so far has been within . They've been on it for two months now, so for a two-month sitewide rangeblock of the /44, anon. only, account creation disabled. If disruption moves to the rest of the /40, we can widen.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 08:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * blocked 2 months. Nothing more to do. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)