Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martianpelli/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Evidence is as follows: Something is clearly up here, since the two "newbies" are contesting deletion and removing tags as some of their very first edits. Thanks! GABgab 00:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * All accounts were created on June 22, within 67 minutes of one another - the alleged master was the first.
 * All have created userpages within 12 minutes of one another, two of them (EditorialMess and CassidyOLP) implying some sort of writing occupation. The alleged master has also claimed to work at a magazine, just like CassidyOLP.
 * CassidyOLP's "I hope I'll enjoy my journey inside the wikipedia arts" vs. EditorialMess's "I just hope to enjoy the journey."
 * All of them are interested in photography to some extent: Joey Shaw fashion photographer (created by the alleged master),, ,.
 * Suspicious activity on the Joey Shaw article:
 * All accounts contesting deletion:.
 * Suspected socks removing CSD tags:.
 * Ending posts with "Thanks" or "Thank you":.
 * Actually, could we please move this to the Samantha.rusconi SPI? After a check in the archives, that seems to be the master - same Joey Shaw page created, and she also ended her posts on the SPI with "thanks" or "thank you." Pinging for clerk assistance. A sleeper check is probably necessary, as it has been 4 years without any apparent activity. Thank you very much! GABgab 00:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * is.
 * I've blocked the confirmed accounts without tags.
 * The accounts at Sockpuppet investigations/Samantha.rusconi are . The Shaw connection is obvious, but I haven't examined the rest of the behavior.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Admin action needed - EditorialMess certainly looks behaviorally connected based on the non-deleted evidence, please block. I'm not making a determination of whether this group is connected to Samantha.rusconi, so it'd be great if an administrator could evaluate the evidence. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 02:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * blocked, deleted edits are quite clear this is a sock. Nakon  05:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Accounts tagged, closing. Mike V • Talk 22:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The accounts at Sockpuppet investigations/Samantha.rusconi are . The Shaw connection is obvious, but I haven't examined the rest of the behavior.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Admin action needed - EditorialMess certainly looks behaviorally connected based on the non-deleted evidence, please block. I'm not making a determination of whether this group is connected to Samantha.rusconi, so it'd be great if an administrator could evaluate the evidence. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 02:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * blocked, deleted edits are quite clear this is a sock. Nakon  05:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Accounts tagged, closing. Mike V • Talk 22:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)