Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martin.musatov/Archive

Report date April 12 2009, 09:58 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Q  T C


 * This 3RR report
 * Their edit histories of P_%3D_NP_problem


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * Note additional obvious evidence at . He coerced innocent user User:Otisjimmy1 into adding a reference on his behalf at User talk:Otisjimmy1. He created a page Talk:P_%3D_NP_problem/Comments where he tried to use editsemiprotected to get another innocent user to edit on his behalf. He uploaded the diagram File:NPCclosed.gif at Commons describing his original research, which I deleted. He's created a number of copy-paste forks that he then adds his reference to, such as AH (complexity) (which I also deleted). Dcoetzee 10:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See also, in which he removed a comment by me contesting his reference with a different sock, with edit comment "Correction amended anonymously per U.S. Bill of Rights".


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Blocked User:Anonymousone2 as probable sock William M. Connolley (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * and indef'd,  remains unblocked although evidence is suggestive. Avruch  T 18:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hrm, to be honest, I find the evidence conclusive. He signed his name "Martin Michael Musatov" on his user page. Dcoetzee 20:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, conclusive is probably more accurate. I just get into the hang of saying "suggestive" on SPI, bit of a clerical weasel word I guess. Avruch  T 20:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I blocked Anonymousacademic for this reason and more. Time to close. Valley2 city ‽ 06:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Everything has been indef blocked, though I haven't touched the IP (not enough recent activity to require a block) Valley2 city ‽ 06:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Evidence submitted by User:Nsk92
User:Luke18:2-8 has attempted to add to the David Eppstein article a link to a private letter addressed to Martin Musatov. Also, User:Luke18:2-8 edited the pages P (complexity) and Talk:P versus NP problem. These topics are the subjects of editing by User:Martin.musatov and his socks, e.g., etc. Nsk92 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Re Amalthea: Strange, the link to the PDF file that Luke18:2-8 added to the Eppstein article works fine for me. It contains a scanned pdf file of a letter from the UC university officials to Martin Musatov regarding a complaint that he filed with them. In any event, I think that User:Luke18:2-8 does need to be blocked. Subsequent to the filing of this SPI report, there were more instances of disruptve editing by him, such as . Nsk92 (talk) 00:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems it had a problem with hotlinking, it kept redirecting me to some page explaining server errors, until I visited the main index page. I see now that the whole domain is Martin Musatov's. Amalthea  09:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Nsk92 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Luke did use an obvious sock when trying to get the article unprotected, . Anything regarding Martin.musatov will necessarily be though, so you'd have to go with behavioral evidence. Personally, I don't really see it, but that pdf link isn't working for me.  Amalthea  00:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * After a long look into some of the long-term issues on the related pages, the Luke18:2-8 account is blocked for disruption. Amalthea  09:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

07 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

New contributor who signed as M.M Musatov here. Has created an article about prime numbers, which according to User:PrimeHunter is a continuation of past behaviour (explanation here). Checkuser presumably not necessary. Thanks, Physics is all gnomes (talk) 15:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Resueman blocked as a self-proclaimed sock. Amalthea  15:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)