Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathenkozhencherry/Archive

Evidence submitted by Claritas
All users are involved in disruption on Ahatallah - all display the same POV and similar levels of literacy in English. I presume that the sockmaster is attempting to give the impression of a consensus in favour of his/her POV by socking. All evidence can be found on talk:Ahatallah. Claritas § 18:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Keralaxx and Fanatic Handler are blocked as socks of User:Fyodor7.Teutonick is also blocked. wiooiw (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not sure if they are the related


 * 1) ( Assuming ) the ip was checked on the 26th
 * 2) Mathenkozhencherry was editing on the 24th (dynamic ip?)
 * 3) Fyodor7 and Mathenkozhencherry edited on 14:46, 24 February 2010.
 * 4) and on 15:01, 24 February 2010 -- wiooiw (talk) 01:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh dear, I didn't notice this before I initiated a new SPI on puppetmaster Fyodor7. There is some evidence that Mathenkozhencherry and Fyodor7 may be the same person. Here is an instance of the Fyodor7 account responding to a comment to Mathenkozhencherry, on Mathenkozhencherry's own talk page. Here is the Fyodor7 account making a correction to a comment by Mathenkozhencherry. Here is another example of the Fyodor7 account editing a comment made by Mathenkozhencherry. Additionally, both accounts were opened within a few days of each other and around the same time as other confirmed socks of Fyodor7, and both edit articles related to the St. Thomas Christians virtually exclusively.--Cúchullain t/ c 19:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikistalk on 3 editors with significant contributions. I added Arunvroy because I am already convinced he is a sock of Fyodor7. The 1st and 3rd link Cuchullain provided is a little suspicious. But the 4 comments I provided still keeps me uncertain. If Fyodor7 is editing under a proxy, or someway to prevent a connection, with Mathenkozhencherry, then he is aware of the risks and would not have neglected to do the same with the other accounts. wiooiw (talk) 02:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Wiooiw obviously right. this user has only same article edits as Fyodor7. there is no way they can be the same. 4747longstreet (talk) 06:18, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps. wiooiw (talk) 07:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Who are you? –MuZemike 07:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I looked at template at Talk:Ahatallah and i saw what it said. It caught my attention and I came here. 4747longstreet (talk) 07:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm adding User:4747longstreet as a possible sock, as they haven't made any edits previous to these on the SPI, and seems to demonstrate too much knowledge of formatting ("Template", use of formatting colons) for this to be a brand new user. Claritas § 14:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I added the account to the Fyodor7 SPI. At any rate it's obvious this is a sockpuppet and not a new user.--Cúchullain t/ c 14:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The fact that Fyodor7 is trying to disrupt this SPI may indicate that Mathekozhenchery is a sockpuppet. Claritas § 19:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I don't think there is anything else that needs to be done here; all the disruptive accounts have already been blocked. –MuZemike 16:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)