Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matt200055/Archive

10 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. Sum mer PhD (talk) 04:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

See also Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive861.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 04:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

The editor has since claimed he has the other account 'in case he gets hacked', however that seems incompatible with his concurrent use of both accounts and his recent mischief.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Excuse the drive-by edit, but 162.157.225.132 seems to have a bit of a thing about Matt200055's interests as well as scribbling on the talk pages of people on Matt's "evil list". Pinkbeast (talk) 08:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Maybe 162.157.225.132 likes lists. Also, it's not an evil list, it's an EVIL list. Capitalize EVIL. Matt200055 (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you saying you did not make the edits under IP 162.157.225.132? - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 05:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The content and timing of the edits by the IP clearly ascribe them to Matt2000555. Claiming otherwise is an asinine attempt to game the system.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 07:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Please note: This case has been the subject of some discussion at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. has effectively stated that they are also AntiMatt200055 but, AFAIK, has not clearly answered about the IP. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I will let you know that my IP address is 198.53.115.131. Matt200055 (talk) 17:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that you did not make the edits under 162.157.225.132? - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am saying that. I only make edits under my account. I did make one edit under 198.53.115.131 (but that was before I created Matt200055). Matt200055 (talk) 20:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * That seems highly unlikely. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 21:08, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The highly unlikely is still possible. Matt200055 (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

I have added both IP addresses to the case. has said he used one but denies using the other. This seems highly unlikely, given that both IPs trace to TELUS Communications in Edmonton and the IP he is denying was used to replace the page User:Jeffro77 with content from Morten Harket, a member of A-ha. (Matt200055 has made numerous edits to pages related to the band.) What happens with this case is up to admin discretion. If nothing else, it seems clear that there are on-going problems with Matt200055's interactions. I have suggested he pursue adoption. I guess we'll see. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 21:08, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * At best, the editor recruited a meatpuppet to vandalise my User page. However, it seems more likely that the retributive action at my User page was taken by Matt200055 himself.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 02:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Jeffro77, both may be from TELUS Communications of Edmonton, but that proves nothing. There are thousands that have IP's under TELUS. And SummerPhD, I will consider adoption. Matt200055 (talk) 21:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I see you're going with an attempt to game the system. It is not even worth considering the infinitesimally small probability that an entirely unrelated editor with the same ISP decided to vandalise my User page with content related to your primary subject a short time after I removed inappropriate content from your User page.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The archived ANI referenced above has been reactivated at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents.-- Jeffro 77  (talk) 02:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both already been blocked, closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)